Thursday, December 31, 2020

Rattling in my brain-pan

  • The Thomas Jefferson Bible is a historic curiosity-slash-oddity. Over at the New Yorker Vinson Cunningham places the book and its creator in historical context. When contrasted with the Bible of Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King Jr., Cunningham finds the Jefferson Bible — to put it mildly — wanting. This is a deeply nuanced and frankly disturbing portrait of a particular personality and the eras that were shaped, for better and for worse, by it.

  • I had forgotten what a dismal year 1990 was for movies. This was a year when I could, and did, attend at LEAST one movie a week. If I look at the box office for '90 only four American titles jump out as being exceptional: Goodfellas, Joe Vs. The Volcano, Jacob’s Ladder and Total Recall. Kinda sums it up, really. Peter Sobczynski’s (misguided) attempt to give a fair re-viewing of Brian DePalma’s The Bonfire of the Vanities is what put me in this reflective state. And while I appreciate Sobczynski’s intellectual efforts . . . really, that movie is an appalling train-wreck no matter what lens you see it through.

  • American Utopia on Broadway: Original Cast Recording is the album that received the most play from me this year. I did not attend Byrne’s Toronto concerts. Nor did I see the Broadway show. And I haven't yet queued up Spike Lee’s movie of the show. But I'll get to it — eventually. Right now I’m enjoying what the music itself conjures for me, and I don’t want the visuals to get in the way. At LARB Sarah Black McCulloch sorts out what makes for an exceptional concert movie — This Should Be a Movie: “American Utopia,” the Concert Film, and Extending a Terrific Moment.

Thursday, December 24, 2020

Vintage Whisky, 2020

2020 — I think we all scrambled to find our footing just a bit, no? In March I attempted to reconnoiter the waters ahead, here and here. In December it all came back to the guitar.

Other matters:

Mennonites

Movies

Music
Miscellaneous

Chilly Gonzales, A very chilly christmas

Some welcome and personally recommended new musical renderings along Christmas themes. 

I tend to skip the few tracks with spoken-word performances — dear performers, it’s not you it’s me. But the strictly Chilly tracks are exactly right for me, right here right now.

Chilly Gonzales, A very chilly christmas

Publish or perish?

My friend shuttered his blog this summer. I was sorry to see it — his posts always prompted me to up my game. When I asked him about it, he quoted Dionysius the Areopagite: “Let your speech be better than silence, or be silent.”

We hashed it out a bit, he and I. At that time I was having a minor crisis over the content here. It seemed like there was a winnowing of subject matter taking place that had nothing to do with my interests, investments or desires. Not only was the injunctive to “Stay in my lane” disconcerting, I was forced to question if a lane for me to stay in actually existed. Suburban, white hetero-normative cis-gendered Gen-X Anabaptist male, happily married, committed two decades to raising two daughters, one of whom, in recent years, declared himself “Trans” — no lane for you, mate. Best to shut up and let it roll.

I considered taking a sabbatical, but knew it would be the death-knell for my blogging. And for reasons I couldn’t quite name, that did not “feel” right.

This morning while lightly perusing posts which might qualify for “Vintage 2020 Whisky” I spotted a dropped thread — a casualty of said crisis, and not an insignificant one. The Bible vs. Walt Disney: my Scylla and Charybdis? launched a particular inquiry in a particular direction, and was pretty much 100% in my lane. It needed capping — maybe doing so might unveil justification to keep going with this business.

A quick recap: Walt Disney was “just so tired of remembering it that way — well, so was I! I wanted to write fantastic pulp sci-fi — my grade 8 English teacher wanted nuanced reckoning with contemporary Mennonite concerns. Later, my Creative Writing prof confirmed my worst fears — if I was going to do this fiction thing, not only would I have to read a lot of crap I didn’t want to read, I’d have to write it, too. I was approaching full-circle.

It is by now a common observation that social media have given everyone a platform to let their voices be heard, thus revealing how little there is worth saying. There is a flip-side to this (to my mind rather suspect) judgment call — internet access to world wide collective media has revealed just how far removed these corporate entities are from humanist concerns. A casual observer can see it at a glance — the ledes at the pages of WSJ, NYT, CNN, Fox News, etc all have their toes tight to the line. These are all competing with each other in aid of becoming The Mono-Culture. You want to talk “intellectual content”? That particular print of wallpaper has become faded and thin.

Blogging is self-publishing. My tribe has been doing it for centuries, putting out stuff that’s every variety of regrettable, alongside unexpected material that illuminates previously hidden facets of existence.

Is it better than silence? Damned if I know. But when I look at what I produce for others, I tend to think I haven’t done nearly enough self-publishing — blog-posts, fiction, songs plays poetry recipes and psalms . . . what’s holding me back?

Thoughts to explore in a future post, perhaps. Or not.

Hope to see you in 2021 — please be well.

The Truth is marching on!

Saturday, December 19, 2020

Whisky Prajer’s 2020 Year In Review — A Miscellany!

Two-faced so-and-so that I am, I’ve cooled on “end of the year” lists, but here are two I very much appreciate:

And now: Whisky Prajer’s 2020 Year In Review — A Miscellany!

Last movie I saw in a theatre:

  • Star Wars, thanks to a Disney attempt to nudge the box office stats by lowering tickets to $5. Enjoyed watching it with the younger. Prior to that we drove out for Parasite after Bong Joon-Ho won the AA. In both cases I was dispirited by just how many screens were competing with the silver screen I’d paid to see. It’d be nice if every ticket purchase was preceded with a EULA: “By hitting ‘purchase’ the customer agrees to keep cell-phone activity restricted exclusively to the lobby, on penalty of complete forfeiture of theatre access.”

Movies I was set to drive out to, before . . . you know:

  • Dune — after missing Contact in the theatres it’s now my policy to watch Denis Villeneuve on the large screen.
  • James Bond — I’ve gone back and forth on this, and might some more. Craig’s 007 cooled on me faster than I could ever have anticipated. Still, spectacle on this scale is best served as large as possible. So, who knows?

Songs that forced me to pull over and clear my eyes:

  • The live version of “Spirits Will Collide” by Devin Townsend. His latest hasn’t moved me as much as his earlier stuff, so I was not expecting this.
  • Church House Blues” by Crystal Shawanda — another pleasant surprise. The entire album rocks, in fact, and her cover of Tragically Hip’sNew Orleans Is Sinking” is exactly what a cover should be — a repossession so thorough it takes place at a cellular level and becomes Shawanda’s song. There isn’t a weak link anywhere on this album.

Games I finished:

Book I most enjoyed:

  • 2020 was mostly about re-reading, actually, and the few new titles I did read to conclusion were not well-served by my 2020-altered focus. However, Andrew Unger’s Once Removed was the pleasant exception that broke through my fog and took hold of my consciousness. Review forthcoming.

Most satisfactory acquisition:

  • A blonde Squier Classic Vibe '50s Telecaster, made in Indonesia. 

There are so many wyrd eddies and sworls that looped around this instrument finding its way into my hands. First of all, I’ve never liked the look of 'em. Telecasters always struck me as a little blocky, while the Les Paul looks like Rock ‘n’ Roll, or The Blues, or Jazz — just about any genre you care to name. Telecasters look like Merle Haggard (not that there’s anything wrong with that).

Secondly, I made the purchase physically, immediately after lockdown ended. I phoned Long & McQuade in Oshawa and asked them to set it aside for me, then drove down to try it out. It was a brutally hot day. When I got to the store, things were busy, though not disturbingly so.

That changed. People kept arriving, the store got fuller, and finally a staff member leaped to the door and locked it until the situation was back under control.

Meanwhile my phone was ringing. The psychiatric assessment my wife and younger daughter were attending had concluded with my suffering kid being remanded into emergency custody for the first time. I took this news while dumbly holding a guitar that now struck me as an utterly dipshit whim. I hurriedly bought it — in the box, not strumming so much as a single chord — threw it in the trunk and took it straight home. During the ride the calls continued as we tried to sort out the various “What do we do now?” scenarios, all of which were complicated by COVID.

It was some days before I took it out of the box and plugged it in. My heart wasn’t in it, to say the least. But I did some basic explorations, jigged various settings, and to my surprise found myself playing this guitar differently than I was my others — including, especially, the LP. The Tele was pulling me in unusual directions, prompting different expressions, suggesting new routes and avenues to check out and play in.

It felt like a gift. It still does.

More anon, hopefully. Safe holidays to you and yours, and Merry Christmas.

Monday, December 14, 2020

“Vintage Whisky”

Pull up a chair, get comfy...

Each year links to a culling of posts I think stand up best from that particular trip around Ol’ Sol. And as ever, Dear Reader, thank you for giving me a sliver of your beleaguered attention-span — thank you, thank you, thank you.

Thursday, December 10, 2020

The Great Emergence: How Christianity Is Changing And Why

The Great Emergence: How Christianity is Changing and WhyThe Great Emergence: How Christianity Is Changing And Why by Phyllis A. Tickle
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Tickle provides a brisk and breezy overview, predominantly of Western Christianity, with North American Christianity given particularly close consideration as she attempts to chart possible courses forward.

There are a number of trenchant critiques to be found here at Goodreads and elsewhere, and certainly my marginalia pen was kept busy as I read. But in the main, Tickle’s book lays out a readable survey of Church history that every North American Protestant ought to be familiar with — OUGHT to be familiar with. Hey, if some of what people are gabbing about here is new to you, why not pick this up and give it a little of your own attention? A reader could do much worse.

Supplementary material: Diarmaid MacCulloch’s Gifford Lectures on Silence Within Church History covers the same points of divergence Tickle does, plus a great deal more — and very engagingly (thanks, Paul!).

Plus: my earlier reaction to what I was reading in The Great Emergence still pertains.

View all my reviews

Monday, December 07, 2020

The Force, Don Winslow

 The ForceThe Force by Don Winslow
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

When Winslow wrote Savages he sorted out exactly how to turn the heat of his prose up to 11. His subsequent novels were all immediately addictive reads, and The Force is no different. It is tempting to compare his prose to that of James Ellroy, another hardboiled stylist keen to punch through readerly indifference. To do so is to highlight Ellroy's inefficencies -- Ellroy's roster of characters is larded with indecipherable psychopaths whose motivations are opaque, while Winslow's bunch are epically compromised, to be sure, but explicable in their motivation. And in Winslow's world there are consequences that cannot be forever dodged.

I was initially cool toward Winslow (I'm not a fan of Dawn Patrol) but he has utterly won me over. One of the most exciting pulp novelists in 21st Century America.

View all my reviews

Thursday, December 03, 2020

The peculiar catholicity of The Hudson's Bay Co.'s building at Portage Ave. and Memorial Blvd. in Winnipeg

Dear P___ -

Thanks for the newsflash. Wow. I knew Winnipeg’s flagship Hudson Bay was in trouble, and I accepted (at least in theory) its imminent closure. But a closure of this magnitude is momentous, isn’t it? Shakes the soul just a bit.

You ask if I have memories of The Bay. I could fill a book, you sly devil! But here are two in particular.

The first is a Christmas memory, probably from 1985 or so when I was just launching into my 20s (35 years ago — yikes). 

I was working in a camera store with my childhood buddy Kaz, who’d got me the job. Our boss, BT, was a super-sharp guy maybe a decade older than us. BT wasn’t so much happily married as he was ecstatically married. At a time when vanity plates were a rarity, BT’s Volvo had plates engraved with his wife’s first name. As he sorted out the business, he’d check in on the status of our suitoring, or lack thereof. BT encouraged us to get out there, sharpen our skills and make something of ourselves so we could do as well as he had — in the marriage department, that is. There was never any doubt among the three of us that he was the only one with any business savvy.

Every once in a while he’d find some reason to bring in his younger sister-in-law, Sara — a girl our age. She was, of course, very lovely, vivacious, terrific fun to be with. Kaz and I idly wondered if BT wasn’t attempting to set her up, but the point was moot — we both had enough self-awareness to realize that next to her we were, if amiable enough company, utter laggards. She was an artist, a sharp wit, the youngest child of Viennese émigrés. To be sure, Kaz and I held to the delusions of grandeur that possess any lad in his early 20s. But we both knew beyond any doubt whatsoever that until one of us could offer yearly trips to Vienna neither of us was anywhere close to Sara’s league.

This particular Christmas Kaz and I closed the shop then walked down Portage Avenue to The Bay to check in — at her own request — on Sara. She was working the perfume counter on the main floor, and when she saw us shuffling over and grinning from ear to ear she lit up. 

Literally. She was a smoker and we were her smoke break.

We kibitzed and flirted and it all seemed so incomprehensibly glamorous and adult. The Bay Main Floor was an adult place where one encountered adult finery — furs, suits, footware with Italian names etched into the soles, perfume. Expensive stuff, all of it. Including Sara, who was being impossibly generous and kind.

I don’t know what Kaz and I did after that. Odds are we hoofed it through the bitter cold and spent an hour or two at one of the neighbouring arcades, letting go of money we were never going to spend on a trip to Vienna.

The second memory is of the same vintage, probably my final year of studies at the University of Winnipeg. Between classes and work I drank a lot of coffee, more often than not with Terry, also a childhood friend from the 'Bach. For a change of scenery Terry and I would occasionally leave campus and head for the coffee shop in the Bay basement — “the Bay am Kjalla,” in the vernacular of our tribe.

Though separated by only a single floor the Bay am Kjalla was the ramshackle Yin to the Main Floor’s rarefied Yang. We understood from childhood already that the Bay am Kjalla was where a person could buy a single shoe, or underwear that had been re-packaged. If a can of soup was too rich for a student’s blood we could drop a quarter for a bowl of it in the Bay’s basement cafeteria.

No soup for us — Terry and I were there to drink coffee and bear one another’s family travails, while casting glances at customers sorting through dishevelled wares.

“Hang on. Isn’t that D’s mother?”

I looked. Sure enough, over at the Malt Shoppe stand was an elegant woman in a fur coat, ordering a plate of cheesy nachos.

I was floored.

D was a high-school buddy, and whenever we visited his home his mother would present us with deceptively simple fare for us to nosh on. Just one example: split croissants, with lox and pickled red onion. This was nothing like the tuna melts we enjoyed at other friends. Her food was always a revelation.

Watching her receive a paper plate of reheated corn chips smothered in processed cheese was also a revelation, one discomfitingly intimate — like witnessing an Anabaptist foot-washing, or a communicant’s reception of the Host.

Both these moments kinda set me up for adulthood, in a way. The dance, the negotiation for balance. Aspire. Accept. Give pleasure. Accept pleasure. Be humble. And always be generous — always. All in this one physical space.

I hope kids these days have a similar physical space somewhere — a place to observe, and observe yourself observing. Or maybe that’s just my reflexive nostalgia slipping into high gear. I mean, the place was a frickin’ STORE, for crying out loud — it wasn’t a cathedral or art gallery.

But that’s probably what set The Bay apart from other shops. Folks who shop at Harry Rosen’s do so because Harry Rosen sells one particular tier of goods to one particular tier of customer. The Bay sold some of that. The Bay also sold irresistibly cheesy nachos. It was, in this sense, a catholic institution.

I miss it already.

End-note: I thought the bit about “a single shoe, or underwear that had been re-packaged” sounded troublingly familiar, so I did a quick search. Lo and behold I’m plagiarizing myselfsomebody cancel me! So: was the incident with D’s mother in Eaton’s, or the Bay am Kjalla? Probably the Bay, to be honest (Terry says he remembers the moment). But the two cellars were nearly identical, and Terry would often visit me at Astral Photo in the Eaton Place Mall. We would go to Greenjean's for the draft beer, Buffalo Chips and ees schmaunt (did someone say, "Hats Off"?). 

Saturday, November 28, 2020

The dangerous game, continued.

Alas, I can no more claim my warrior uncles’ shared mantle of virtue than I can atone for Hamm’s crimes against humanity. It’s a historic fluke (or inscrutable act of God) that brought my gene pool to this side of the Atlantic, while the rest of my tribe stayed put in momentary comfort, only to endure successive scourges of 20th century European warfare and Russian revolution. Had the tables been turned the other way, how much Nazi generosity would I have had the sand to resist?

A Mennonite woman at her home in the Chortitza colony in Nazi-occupied Ukraine, 1943, sewing with photograph of Hitler on the wall: source.

Still, I’m struck by Hamm’s splenetic antisemitism. A reader of the typed report might argue Hamm was playing to his Nazi audience, but Hamm’s letters to Russian Mennonite clergy bear signs of conviction in this matter. And there is no indication he ever received correction from the clergy. We are at a great remove from the Sermon on the Mount here.

It is a remove kicked into gear decades earlier. When Russia dissolved into chaos at the close of the Great War, Mennonite clergy declared a dispensation on their strict adherence to pacifism — a historic first.

At that time Mennonite communities were suffering anarchist raids led by Nestor Makhno, the details of which are brutal. Their reflexive formation of militia units — Selbstschutz — was an epic, if understandable, blunder for the Mennonites. In hindsight, aligning with Tsarist Germans in the heart of Ukraine as the twin fevers of Russian nationalism and revolution were in full flare was a tactic fated to end poorly, to put it mildly.

As is the way with these things, following traumatic defeat at the hands of Makhno’s Red Army-backed goons, a sense of grievance and abandonment set in. Germans had been the only people to consistently show sympathy for the beleaguered Mennonites — thereafter I imagine it became a common conviction that only Germans could be trusted in this increasingly hostile environment. As the German Tsarists morphed into Nazis, some ideological bleed-over was almost inevitable. When your only pals with guns are spouting an endless stream of antisemitic hooey, it probably doesn’t take much of a nudge to jump tracks and lay the sins of Bolshevism at the feet of the Jews.

Selbstschutz, round 2: this time led by Nazis: source.

Full disclosure: were we to procede further with the Mennonite Game into the realm of Mennonite Eugenics, my blood is 100% pure Kleine Gemeinde the holiest of the holy, baby!1 If there is one skill we have honed over the generations it is a keen proficiency for locating the mote in your eye. When the trembling remnant of our Russian tribe finally relocated to our neck of the woods in Canada, we let it be known (in ways both subtle and not) that, had they but followed God’s Word like we did when we did, all their troubles would have been avoided. For some reason they never felt like unburdening themselves of their sins in this environment.

We heard a great deal about Nestor Makhno, though. If you ever want to see an 85-year-old Mennonite’s face turn dark with hatred, just say that name out loud.

Or present them with this adorable figurine collectible.

It’s curious to read Makhno’s Wiki. The rough outline of his life and actions is set down with a cool dispassion. And for reasons I can’t begin to fathom, the issue of his possible antisemitism is raised and kinda-sorta settled in his favour. So long as you were up for war against “the rich bourgeoisie of all nationalities” — including your own — you were welcome aboard Team Makhno.

None of this in any way excuses or exonerates my tribe, never mind Ham and Epp, for words said and grievous actions taken. I raise these matters in the conviction that it behooves Mennonites2 and Mennonite Historians in particular to not just uncover the “What” but to meditate hard on the “Why” of the matter — particularly at this hour of our history. Without at least cursory attention to the “beams” warping the critical acumen of our own current milieu, I should think the chances of some variant of recidivism are greatly increased.

End-note: John Longhurst covers a night of history-baring at the Jewish Heritage Centre in Winnipeg. More of this, please.


1 Fun fact: I am one-quarter Goossen. O bah, Ben, once — if you’re up for a round of the Mennonite Game, drop me a note! 2 I almost wrote “Mennonite Theologians,” but that’s redundant. We are all theologiansespecially the Mennonite atheists.

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

The dangerous game

“The Mennonite Game” is played when two or more Mennonites meet for the first time — participants cycle through names they might have in common and figure out how they are related. Nobody wins (unless these are the rules).

My family line comes from Russian Mennonite stock. Both my mother’s and father’s families lead back to the first wave of Russian Mennonites immigrating to Canada in the 1870s. I’m fifth-generation Canadian.

It is a possibility I might be of some relation to the Nazi Hamm, but a very distant one.

There were a number of motivations for the first wave. My sense of it is these people weren’t doing too well in the Russian settlements — at a place and time when the Mennonite tribe overall was, for once, generating conspicuous wealth. My ancestors’ dissatisfaction with their social standing dovetailed with a pious disaffection, a feedback loop that polished the allure of British North America.

When the Great War was fought, there were some Canadian Mennonites who fell in for King and Country, but not very many. By the end of the Dirty Thirties, however, attitudes were changing. Mennonite clergy were unequivocal in their opposition to enlistment and conscription; the young men of the community, not so much. The majority plead their case as Conscientious Objectors. If rejected, they either accepted assignment to C.O. reforestation camps (among other government projects) or kept a low profile and hid in the barn. 

A significant minority enlisted — on my father’s side alone I have three great-uncles who volunteered and fought.

Photo: Claude P. Dettloff. Source
One uncle landed with the vanguard on Juno Beach and fought right into Berlin. I’m old enough to have heard some of his stories — if this Nazi Hamm’s boys encountered my uncle’s company, it did not go well for the brothers.

This is a short bit of historical unspooling, and I do it for two reasons. First of all, when I read “The Real History of the Mennonites and the Holocaust” I read: “The REAL History (etc).” This subset of my family history is, I hope, also the real history of the Mennonites and the Holocaust.

The second reason . . .

Friday, November 20, 2020

Puzzling over Mennonite Nazis

Earlier this month an on-line acquaintance pointed me to “How to Catch a Mennonite Nazi” over at Anabaptist Historians. I found it all grimly fascinating, surprising and of course deeply troubling. 

Then Tablet picked it up and highlighted it in their daily newsletter (re-titled: “The Real History of the Mennonites and the Holocaust”). When I opened the email I swallowed hard and glanced at the clock. Sure enough, within a day or two I heard from my Jewish friends. I had some 'splainin’ to do.

I was grateful for the time of deliberation. The longer I mulled it all over, the more curious it seemed to me that antisemitism was very much NOT in the purview of the milieu that raised me. Here I was, a kid isolated in the prairies in a community proficient in the German language. Back when it came time to fight the Nazis, the religiously sanctioned community response was to stay out and stay home. You’d think this would be fertile ground for antisemitism. 

Instead the church library stocked accounts of Christians who had given shelter to Jews during the Holocaust, alongside survivor accounts like Elie Wiesel’s Night. The most widely read of these was The Hiding Place by Corrie ten Boom. In fact, although I was not as a child permitted to set foot in a movie theatre to enjoy Disney’s bland entertainments, a dispensation was made for a Billy Graham funded production of The Hiding Place. (The other exception was Hazel’s People. After that I was permitted to see Star Wars, and then it was game over.)

Not a "first date" movie -- unless you're Mennonite.

I have recollections of childhood conversations with my mates about how we might comport ourselves during a Nazi occupation. My cohort and I tacitly understood that of course we would shelter Jews — that’s just what Christians did. I don’t think it sunk in until I was almost 20 that Christians also sent Jews to the camps. By that point I could banish the cognitive dissonance by putting scare-quotes around “Christian” and reassuring myself that at least these people were not Mennonite.

So much for that.

This Heinrich Hamm presents a second curiosity. Hamm, it seems, had no difficulty buying into the antisemitic tenets of Hitler’s Third Reich — indeed he proselytized on its behalf. Most of the Mennonites who left Russia during and following the war vigorously asserted that antisemitism was not in any way any part of the Mennonite scene, that Mennonites were co-sufferers and frequent co-conspirators with the Jews in their mutual desperation to escape the hell that Russia had become. While that might not be an outright lie, it is clearly not the whole truth, either.

More anon...

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Rattling in my brain-pan

I’m still mulling over what “Stay calm and decolonize” might look like for a fifth-generation Canadian Mennonite. Ms. Sainte-Marie, after making the utterance, is notably vague in details. And that’s as it should be — terse aphorisms that puncture widely-held preconceptions are best served by further aphorisms of a similar nature.

"I get by with a little help from my friends"

But here are some longer reads that are currently fermenting thought.

  • At Aeon, Canadian veterinary epidemiologist David Waltner-Toews meditates on wisdom and pandemics. “A person might achieve wisdom after decades; a community after centuries; a culture after millennia. Modern human beings as a species? We’re getting there, and pandemics can help.”
  • So many books! I tuned out at the halfway mark. But John Gray has me curious with his recommendation of Aztec Philosophy, by James Maffie.
  • “‘Socioeconomic progress is directly to blame for a wider basis for sexual repression.’ Where markets tremble, sexuality is policed, and wherever there are police, the ‘deviants’ of a society become more visible... ‘Thus the massive American economic boom of consumer society following the second World War extended middle-class sexual norms to ever more Americans and led to the most extensive policing of homosexuality in any period of history.’” At The New Republic Josephine Livingstone reviews Christopher Chitty’s Sexual Hegemony: Statecraft, Sodomy and Capital in the Rise of the World System.
  • Huh — looks like Matthew Yglesias has left Vox to hang his shingle at Substack. The first wave of “Stackers” were positively giddy with the new medium. I have misgivings. Also, I have a budget — I can’t afford to bankroll more than three or four of these jokers. And frankly, five Yankee sawbucks doesn’t buy what it used to.

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Lou Reed, reconsidered

Steven Hyden bids us reconsider Lulu — the critically maligned 2011 collaboration between Lou Reed and Metallica — “THE DEFINITIVE ALBUM OF 2020.”

"They're comin' round, Lou!"

Consulting my digital player of choice, I see I last heard Lulu the first week of February. That was 2020, and I still didn’t enjoy or “like” it. But that was nine months ago — nine months of this rough beast that still is 2020, and will be for at least the next seven weeks. Maybe some reconsideration is in order?

Way back in '11 I cheered news that Reed was in studio working with Metallica on his next album. In the week or two prior to release the studio rolled out preorder packages for various iterations of the album that could take up space in our collective Walls Of Plastic. The chichi “Deluxe Tube-Box and Poster” version appealed, as did the even chichier (and pricier) “Deluxe CD/Hardcover Book Set.” The consumer could even opt for both, at a one-time premium discount!

I am an easy mark for the rock and roll commodity fetish — I reached for my credit card...

"Wait'll I tell my wife!"

...then the first “single” was released on YouTube as a video.

I changed my purchase option to “CD only.” 

Nine years later, if, upon my next reconsideration, I should choose to opt into the fancier packages, both the Tube and Coffee-Table Book versions can be had for pennies on the dollar.

Coincidentally, Rhino Records has released a celebration of Lou Reed’s New York, the 1989 album that initially turned me on to LR. I hesitated. Rhino has opted for bloat, IMHO — the vinyl won’t receive any play from Yours Truly (though the older kid might give them a spin) and for my money the disc of early versions and rough edits could have been a limited-time digital download. But the remastering of the original album was HIGHLY desirable, as was the DVD of the The New York Album Live At The Théâtre St-Denis in Montreal. I did some scouting, and with perseverance found the whole shebang for just about half Rhino’s asking rate. This seemed right to me — I hit “Add To Cart.” And I’m glad I did.

New York receives, at a minimum, a once-a-year dust-off from me. The recent remastering is excellent — the sound separation better, and the compression entirely welcome (the '89 CD is, like most discs from that era, a touch too bright). The songs read as solidly as ever, with the singular exception of “Good Evening Mr. Waldheim” which plays like a Twitter rant. The live versions of the songs sound terrific, with audience noise pushed way to the back so that the disc plays like a single concert, similar to the Montreal DVD. And the DVD alone is enough to justify the purchase.

Still, that is a lot of shelf space...

And, yes, I kvetched about the “rough tracks” CD. But I’m glad I gave it a spin. The “work tape” tracks reveal some of Reed’s method — he gets particular musicians to run over a single line multiple times until he hears exactly what he wants to hear, and then that is the way it gets played in the final take. As for the “rough mix” tracks, they are exactly what you hear on the finished CD, minus backing vocals. I’ve given it one play, and will consign the disc to The Wall, reserving only “The Room” for my digital library.

David Fricke’s gatefold essay begins with mention of “The Room” (“‘I’ll play you this thing,’ Lou Reed said...”) then artfully unspools the man and the artist Reed was, at the particular time and place when he put down this particular record. 

That said, the most striking element of Fricke’s essay occurs early when he dubs “Romeo Had Juliet” — the killer opening track on New York — “a fire-escape love song crammed with urban apocalypse.”

Eyeeeeah... I mean who doesn’t want to pin down a song that caromes from shitty-little-tenancy to fire-escape to steaming-city-street? And yet . . . it is remarkable to me that Fricke seems to miss what Reed makes quite plain: much of what the listener hears being poetically rendered in Reed’s lyrics are the post-coital ruminations of a street thug who has just raped a girl.

There is always something about Lou Reed that the listener, no matter how attentive, never quite “gets” and certainly that is the case with me and Lulu. Hyden says, “A crucial mistake that many people made with initially engaging with Lulu ... is thinking of it as being as much of a Metallica record as a Lou Reed one.” Hyden gets close to the locus of my own disappointment, here. Reed took Metallica into the studio, then marched them through the usual Lou Reed paces until he got what he wanted to hear from them. To those of us with some appreciation for what Metallica typically does, it sounded like a bad Velvets covers band. And while I am not a Metallica fan, I expected differently.

But, hey — I am up for an exercise in reconsideration. At some point, and I’m not committing to when, I will take a deep breath and sit down with Lulu again. And if I remain unmoved, you won’t be hearing about it here.

Friday, November 06, 2020

Back to the barn

“Stay calm and decolonize”: I, II, III.

Dear P____,

So nice to hear from you again. And gratifying to know your mother remains in vigorous good health — something none of us can take for granted as we age, no matter how “healthy” we may have been in our younger years.

My mother has been on my mind quite a bit of late. Pandemic precautions would have been too much for her, I suspect. Lois loved to have people drop by for a visit and was especially protective of time spent with her two grandkids. At this juncture Christmas looks like it might be celebrated in isolation, a prospect that would have thrown Lois into a dark sorrow. 

“Visits” — these were super important to her, particularly family. She made a point of attending cousin gatherings whenever and wherever they occurred. In fact, if memory serves her final road trip was to a cousin-fest out west. When the pain of her condition kept her housebound the cousins had to come to her — one or two at a time.

Somewhere around the turn-of-the-mil she made mention of a beloved cousin moving from the Maritimes back to Manitoba. His boy had trained as an opera singer and went pro for a stretch in Europe. The boy eventually married another singer, a Dutch girl, and when they became in the family way they relocated to farm in Canada, eventually winding up in Manitoba, where they took over an old Mennonite housebarn for their purposes.

Still humble, still home: source

For Lois this was cause for great delight. When my parents moved back to Manitoba from California one of her first orders of business was to get in touch with the cousin, reacquaint herself with the boy and meet the family.

It must have been a robust and spirited gathering, because thereafter Lois had five or six stories from that visit that she could be depended upon to trot out and recite for us during visits or phone-calls of our own. When it was time to sell the house and divest, Lois earmarked a few vintage pieces of furniture for the boy’s family and their housebarn — “Unless one of you kids wants them,” she was quick to add. She was safe — those pieces would only take up valuable space, none of us three was living large enough to accommodate them.

The boy and his housebarn loomed large in the imagination — Lois’s, and now mine. He’d be my second-cousin, probably a couple years older than me.1 We’ve yet to meet.

There is no shortage of farmers in my family, but they are all farming on a very different scale from this second-cousin of mine. And taking over a housebarn would probably strike the others as . . . well, why speculate? Suffice to say my second-cousin is the ONLY family member living in a housebarn and “farming small.”

When I contemplate these two agricultural models of commerce there is a curious juxtaposition of value at play. Both are committed to immediate family, and the community around them. Both are transacting with the LARGER community — the nation state, the open market. And both are steering by slightly different constellations. 

I mean — opera. You’ve got all that sex and guts and blood and ethereal striving and some more sex, please. 

Bringing that soaring culture into the housebarn thrilled Lois. You go from working the floorboards in Vienna to working the soil in Manitoba — the sex-and-guts-and-blood still apply, to be sure, albeit on a more intimate scale.

Coincidentally, my second-cousin is neighbour to another Mennonite artist, of whom my mother was an early patron. Margruite Krahn lives in a housebarn of her own with her husband Paul, just up the road. Currently Ms. Krahn’s artistic impulses seem to be pulled by the same team of horses, albeit in a direction uniquely her own. Check it out. Lois would have been super-chuffed, needless to say.

Take care, and let’s us yack again — soon, shall we?

Love, D___


1 FACT-CHECK: dude's seven years my JUNIOR -- my bad.

Wednesday, November 04, 2020

Well...

My first inclination is not to comment at all. But since I put some skin in the game a few months back, it behooves me to say something.

Happier times.

“How’d the polls get it wrong — again?” Back in February of '16 Stephanie Slade persuasively made the case that polls don’t work. The changes that have occurred since then have only made this science slipperier.

Also, my glances at social media — and they are just that, I work very hard to steer clear of it — indicate the predominant mode is 45’s mode. Whether in support of or in opposition to him, participants do not “engage” that mode, they become that mode. Social media — and for all the opprobrium Zuck has rightly received, it is worth noting that Twitter is the platform 45 has mastered — drove this election harder than all the older media combined.

Given the commonality of madness evident in the binary extremes, the best outcome we could hope for was a close one. And here we are.

“Slow Internet,” peoplenow more than ever.

Friday, October 30, 2020

re: colonize

“Stay calm and decolonize”: Part 1, Part 2

Somewhere in this house is a box full of paper — a completed first draft of a novel I wrote in the early '90s. Back then I was not much interested in exploring Mennonite matters, but the plain reality was that the only successful writers in my acquaintance were hammering Mennonite matters pretty hard, 24/7. I threw in a character who was stubbornly refusing to sell the housebarn he lived in — the last intact housebarn in the village — to the car dealer next door, who was keen to tear it down and expand the business.

It's humble but it's home: source.

Flash forward thirty years. Blue Heron Books calls to inform me that my copy of Andrew Unger’s Once Removed has arrived and is on hold for me. I bring it home, and lo and behold, Unger’s protagonist Timothy Heppner is quixotically obsessed with preserving the remaining housebarns in his rapidly “modernizing” village.

I am still in the early pages of Unger’s sputtschreft. Unger is the Putzendoona responsible for The Daily Bonnet — anyone who makes a habit of his website, or its various social media tributaries, should have no difficulty enjoying his book. But more anon, once I’ve finished it.

It’s curious that Unger and I seem to be channeling the same wavelength, somewhat. In '91 I would not have been much moved by the plight of a villager fighting to preserve the last standing housebarn at the centre of a booming agri-industrial prairie town. But I would have been decidedly less moved by a proposed carlot expansion, so my authorial sympathies were very much with my fictional holdout.

This was just gratuitous culture-signalling on my part (“Hey, but now I’m related to Miriam Toews and David Bergen, yet!”) a short episode that didn’t even qualify as a subplot in my larger work. But that I included it at all in the manner I did suggests a contemplation of a possibility that never really left me.

The possibility — the potential desireability, even — of a return to the colony.

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

That thing next week

If my blog is your respite from reflexive doom-scrolling, I apologize for this post. But it is remarkable to me that International Crisis Group, a high-profile preemptive deescalation outfit who typically comment on Yemen or Somalia, is issuing warnings about the risk of violence in the United States.

There is a reason for that:

Friday, October 23, 2020

“I left the colony.”

“Stay calm and decolonize,” continued.

Pop recently attended a high school reunion at the old bach. It was held in the town’s Mennonite Heritage Village, where a large “barn” serves various dishes our tribe has appropriated during our travels and travails. It was a small group, and he assured me a social distancing of sorts was adhered to.

Anyhoo, on his way out dad stopped at the museum gift shop and took a few shots of contempo Menno swag. It appears my tribe is re-branding itself via mildly ironic Plautdietsch puns.


I own a few similar items, courtesy of MJ’s Kafe (or, more accurately, friends and family who frequent the joint). They tend to generate conversation — not from my bunch, mind you, but from die enjlisch who puzzle over the strange spelling and say, “That almost looks German — what language is it?”

My kind might nod in acknowledgement. Or they might head for the other side of the street.

The one item of clothing that has prompted inquiry from a local Mennonite is a hoodie I purchased from the Canadian Mennonite University campus bookstore, during a family visit some years ago.

It was closing in on Christmas, and our church choir was struggling with the yearly cantata. Calls were made for a pinch-hitter director who might marshal a respectable performance out of us. A young woman on a family farm to the south of us had graduated from an honours music program somewhere — CMU, in fact. I was unaware of this when I wore the hoodie to her first choir practice with us. She took one look at this grizzled, gutty Lebowski embedded amongst the bassos and warily asked, “Wheeeeeen did you attend CMU?”

We cautiously played the Mennonite game until common points of reference were uncovered. “Make sure you talk to my parents at Christmas,” she said.

The Christmas meet-and-greet was pleasant, if short — the weather was ugly, and everyone was keen to get stranded at home, and not some cavernous Victorian church building. Still, the father and I had points of connection. But we were struggling with the constellation. 

He grew up Mennonite in Paraguay. In the '70s my grandfather pastored in Paraguay. I ran through some of the nationals my grandparents introduced me to, but none of the names were clicking with my new acquaintance. Finally he said, “I left the colony quite some time ago.”

Well, sure. I could have seen that. In the brief exchange I’d had with his wife it was clear she was a spirited woman with a sharp, potentially cutting, sense of humour. He was a deeply thoughtful sort, very careful with his words. I am, you could say, intimately familiar with this sort of union. Pairs of this nature tend not to suffer the foolishness that embeds itself in colony-imposed strictures.

We leave the colony — early.

Saturday, October 17, 2020

“The brainwashed do not know they are brainwashed.”

I played this old CD while transporting last weekend’s turkey remains to the township disposal site. In the car, with the volume at the optimal level, I marvelled anew at the capacity for some its passages to still send shivers down my spine, all these years later.

How many years later? I checked it out. It’s been 10, pretty much to the day, since I chanced across this marvelous album by this marvelous talent and his band.

Another reason for thanksgiving . . . 

Elsewhere: Rushkoff pines for the days of yore, when WE did all the pranking. I’m reflexively wary of such nostalgia — of any nostalgia, for that matter (at least I hope I am). For my money Carlos Lozado does a better job of summing up the current scene: “The counterculture never died. It just switched sides. Transgression now lives on the right, dogmatism on the left. (Emphasis mine.) It’s kinda what I was poking at with this KISS recollection, back when.

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Transformed, by the renewing of your mind...

This won't hurt a bit...

Do not be configured to this age, but be transformed by the renewal of the intellect, so you may test the will of God, which is good and acceptable and perfect — verse 2 from chapter 12 of Paul’s letter to the Romans 

Stay calm, and decolonizeBuffy Sainte-Marie

These two exhortations take up bedrock space in my consciousness. I believe they are not far removed from each other, if at all.

Paul’s letter to the Roman Christians is a very dense and difficult read. He is striving to re-torque both Jewish and Pagan understanding of human/cosmic consequence into a new shared and mutually liberating framework. It is a bizarre and audacious undertaking, one that sets Paul and his proposed cosmology perfectly at odds with that of the reigning Roman Empire. Shortly after composing the letter Paul is arrested, and executed some time after that.

I don’t understand it very well at all. I’ve asked a couple of scholar friends to break down the rhetoric for me, and the typical qualifier to their subsequent attempts is, “First of all, there are scholars who devote their entire lives to this one letter . . .” Every now and then I get a flash of what Paul is pointing to, a glimpse of the Cosmic Wow that has him writing in circular fits. And the more I read about the Roman Empire, its class structures, and the immense burden of expectation placed on the Empire’s lowest subjects, the better I get at reading this letter.

As a child I memorized the King James Version: “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind . . .” etc

Stay calm, and decolonize.

We just celebrated Thanksgiving up here. My history with the holiday is uncomplicated — by celebrating Thanksgiving we actively take part in a rite my religion requires of its adherents. It’s easy and it’s delicious.

When asked, my Metis friends (all four of 'em) say they’re cool with that — you do you, cousin. My First Nations friends (all three of 'em) just smile and say, “For us it is a little complicated.”

“Decolonize.” Man, with my tribe the only way we were going to make it through at all was to build colonies in the desperate trust that the Russian Empire, or the British Empire, etc would allow us the privilege and — who knows? — maybe even offer us a smidgen of protection in the bargain.

More remains to be said . . .

Saturday, October 10, 2020

The Week, Links

Recommended long-read of the week goes to Francis Fukuyama. LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS: The challenges from the left and the right begs, like the notorious essay that netted FF sustained attention thirty years ago, for a spirited Q&A follow-up, as Fukuyama piles up bones of contention like so many turkey carcasses after Thanksgiving Monday. Anyhoo, Fukuyama’s rhetorical perambulations lead to this money-quote:

I suspect that most religious conservatives critical of liberalism today in the United States and other developed countries do not fool themselves into thinking that they can turn the clock back to a period when their social views were mainstream. Their complaint is a different one: that contemporary liberals are ready to tolerate any set of views, from radical Islam to Satanism, other than those of religious conservatives, and that they find their own freedom constrained.

This complaint is a serious one.

Read it here.

Also:

  • Headlines I never expected to read: Why China’s liberals like Trump; and (at Quartz, of all places!) How Trump’s presidency changed Europe for the better.
  • “Times as weighty as these do not allow for easy enlightenment” — indeed. James Jiang’s profile of Eileen Chang has sent me to the lye-berry.
  • And finally: Is Pandemic Brain changing your taste in music? Personally, I’ve been giving podcasts more and more airtime, but that was a trend started some years before COVID hit. Just this morning I discovered Lost Notes: a collection of the greatest music stories never toldover here. Michael Donaldson brought this to my attention over at his 8sided.blog, a reliable source of internet joy I recommend to anyone who loves music.

Returning to the subject of turkey carcasses come Monday morning — it’s Thanksgiving weekend for us Canuckleheads, so I am wishing you, dear reader, a happy Thanksgiving.

This year's Thanksgiving playlist, courtesy of...

Wednesday, October 07, 2020

Guitars I Dig: EVH’s Frankenstrat

Eddie Van Halen’s Frankenstrat is a workhorse guitar, akin to Steve Vai’s Evo or Brad Gillis’ “shovel” — arguably the most famous workhorse guitar in the history of rock ‘n’ roll.

A first in its 40 year history -- being treated with kid gloves.

EVH only made two of these babies — one in 1978, out of parts of undetermined vintage; the other in 1979 out of Charvel parts from that year. The original is the one that “took” to its maker — EVH played it hard and played it often, only retiring it recently after Fender’s luthiers produced a clone that played, to Eddie’s sensibilities, better than the original.

What I find so terrifically charming about this guitar is just how hammered it is. People who managed to catch last year’s Play It Loud exhibit at the NY Met almost invariably remarked on how beat up these iconic instruments were — and nobody’s more than EVH’s.

The Frankenstrat deservedly has its own wiki, and this guy did a remarkable job of chronicling his painstaking replication of the legendary instrument.

It is evident from both pages that EVH was none-too-gentle about getting his self-built guitar to do what he damn well expected it to do. EVH’s character is revealed in the instrument, I think. While the playing revealed his evident sensitivity, the instrument evidences his drive, stubbornness, force of will. At the end of the day, Van Halen was EVH’s band, and his alone.

RIP, Eddie Van Halen.

Post-script: EVH breaks it all down for Popular Mechanics.

Saturday, October 03, 2020

“Take a little trip with me”

Over in the louche corners of the web (the “louche-web” — remember, you heard it here first) people are asking themselves: I dunno, man, but is 2020 maybe, like, one REALLY bad trip?

"Well, we know where we're goin', but we don't know where we been..."

Erik Davis. Jules Evans. Douglas Rushkoff and Grant Morrison.

For a certain temperament that is exactly the right way to frame it, I think. Not that I’ve been much prone to partaking of so-called mind-altering substances, but I’ve experienced a few moments. 

The most recent was a few years ago, in my friend’s Yorkville apartment. I’d asked him to explain something about Heidegger for me, and was gazing down at the streets where hippies once had themselves QUITE the time. As my friend took care with his words, the sense he made of Heidegger for me was in credible. And the vertigo I experienced . . . 

. . . there is that moment after you have strapped yourself into a thrill-ride when the entire machine slowly cranks and torques into a position where you begin to wonder if you will rocket into the earth or if it will fall down on top of you instead.

Only the vertigo never left. My POV had been altered permanently. I thought I had been looking at roots, but it turned out I was staring at leaves and there was this immense sky behind them. My sense of balance would eventually return, but it took some time.

So, yeah, 2020 — a person who wants to emerge from all its dark wisdom will need a source of gentle, human touch. And freshly-squeezed orange juice.

*****

There is something about spoken-word performances woven into a musical tapestry that holds an unfailing appeal for me. Pink Floyd excelled at this, for a couple of records at least. The Shamen made Terrence McKenna’s prolonged bafflegab enticing. And Steven Wilson turned Voyage 34 into an experience the listener, unlike poor Brian, could recover from.

“Whatever Happened To Gus” — my favourite MMW track.

I was prepped for this scene by a childhood spent listening to film soundtracks. The trend in the 70s was to release some of the music with a smattering, or even all, of the film’s dialogue. Star Wars, Indiana Jones, even Apocalypse Now — among other spoken-word-set-to-music finery, including Strange Brew.

Then Quentin Tarantino came along and took it to another level.

I recently picked up Vangelis’ Blade Runner Trilogy, and I’d say he’s taken it to his own level. The first two discs are from the movie, but the third is “inspired by” it — and it, too, has bits of found-speech peppered into the mix. This move provoked some eye-rolling among critics, but I kind of dig it. For whatever reason, spoken word performances set to music suggest an ethereal realm of thought and possibility where sung music constrains with its necessary formality (exceptions allowed for, of course).

It’s trippy — you dig?

Post title pinched from War.