Friday, January 24, 2020

The aging palate — recorded albums: studio or live?

I recall eavesdropping on a conversation between two high school classmates. They’d just seen Harlequin, Winnipeg’s own arena-filling rock band, in concert and were sorting out which songs sounded most like they did on record.

That epitomized my official thoughts on what rock music ought to be, at the time. I figured the studio release must be the ideal version of the song — after all, every single element that went into the song was 100% in the artist’s control, was it not? Thus the extent to which the band reproduced the sound recorded was, quite naturally, the extent to which they put on a good show.
Paul Simonon, clearly frustrated he is not getting that posh studio sound.
It only took a few, choice, small-venue concerts for me to recant of that particular bias. Still, the bands I dug the most were adept manipulators, who understood the studio album to be one “product,” a live concert another, and a recorded live release something else still. A concert bootleg might be revelatory, but only in the way Joyce’s unpublished work is revelatory of Finnegan’s Wake.

Talking Heads’ Stop Making Sense was the ideal. I loved the studio versions of those songs, but the versions in the movie brought something new to my appreciation for them, as did the visual spectacle. And David Byrne’s instincts for the initial soundtrack were spot-on — it was better for the soundtrack to be evocative of the movie, rather than extracted from the visuals and presented as a half-portion of the thing itself.*

During the child-raising years most of my music listening was conducted through two speakers in the kitchen. And I generally preferred studio work — if the volume is loud enough to cut through the sizzle of minced garlic and anchovies in a pan of hot olive oil you can catch some surprising nuances and subtleties laid out on the, uh, reel-to-reel.**

These days, however, I typically reach for recorded live shows. The “live” sound is so much better than it used to be, for one thing (thank you technology). Also, these hairy old ears aren’t catching nearly as many studio layers as they used to — making the pared-down sound of a recorded single take a better match for them.

Which is a little odd, considering how grumpy I get at concerts. How many times have I announced my “retirement”? My wife took me to task on the most recent. “You’re not retired,” she informed me. “We still haven’t seen the one act I want to see live, with you — Los Lobos.”

Good point. Perhaps a beloved band performing in a spanky up-to-date theatre with actual seats will be just the thing. After all, Steely Dan was an absolute gas.

Stay tuned.

*To my earlier three categories, we could now add a fourth: the home video. I will never forget the first time I queued up Stop Making Sense on the VCR, only to realize within minutes that I was hearing elements in the soundtrack that were not present in the footage I was watching. This had escaped my notice in the immersive environs of the movie theatre. Now here I sat, slack-jawed. Nobody owed me “accuracy,” and I knew as well as any slavering fan that perfect fidelity was a dangerous myth — again, concert bootlegs are obscurities for good reason. Still, the blush of disappointment was real.

**A sit-down listen of Porcupine Tree’s Signify still retains its capacity to elicit goosebumps. But while I note that I should also say I have more love for Steven Wilson’s live version of “Home Invasion/Regret #9” — chiefly because of the rhythm guitar he provides, particularly at the 7-minute mark onward. It’s so simple, but it gives such a propulsive energy to the song. I actually miss it on the studio version.

5 comments:

pdb said...

I’ve still only ever seen Stop Making Sense in clips on YouTube. Across the range, though, my exposure to band product is awfully limited. (T. scored free Pitchfork tickets at work last summer, and I saw the first sizable — not, otherwise, very memorable — rock show of my life as a result.) I missed Talking Heads at their height, along with a lot of other things (Hall and Oates!), but their SMS-years singles were still basic fare on HFS when, a bit late, I abandoned the idea that ‘the world’s music’ should be off-limits a decade later in my early 20s. Took a while before I sorted out that Byrne and, say, Cobain represented to the regular listener two pretty different musical worlds, I recall. Anyway, that peculiar stage(d) energy of SMS, as I’ve experienced it in clips, is something remarkable, I thought on first running into it online and haven’t yet had cause to re-think. I gave my sister (not yet born in 1984) and brother-in-law a copy of it for Christmas a few weeks ago, by funny coincidence here. Need to give her a call and see if they’ve had a chance to watch it.

Whisky Prajer said...

"Hall and Oates" -- weren't you the one who turned me on to LFDH ("New episodes coming soon!")?

The '90s were a bizarre moment to "catch up" to the rock and roll scene, which was pretty much what I was doing as well. I recall working receiving in the basement of the bookstore, listening to radio. At the time CFNY was calling itself "alternative radio." My co-worker buddy would snort, "Alternative to what?" He was given to playing obscure Zappa live sets.

CFNY was one element to Toronto's appeal, for me. I have a deeply embedded memory of the first Sunday night of my Bible college year ('83), when, up in my dorm room, I turned on my box and patiently searched the FM bandwidth for sounds I was not hearing on the prairies. I tripped across Doctor & The Medics covering Greenbaum's "Spirit In The Sky" and I was hooked. Depeche Mode, Tones On Tail, Petshop Boys, Siouxie et al. And Talking Heads was still a band! No "meatball rock" this!

Eight years later I was back in Toronto when Cobain took the chandelier for a swing. I considered myself a discerning listener. In hindsight I was very much your "regular listener" -- just how discerning was it to be a 25-year-old chap whose fixed rotation of CDs included Tom Waits, Lou Reed, Laurie Anderson and AC/DC? And Cobain seemed to be the Great Leveler, the awareness of which surely contributed to his emotional roil.

Nevermind showed up 22 years after Woodstock. 22 years after that Gen-X jumped from iPods to Spotify. "Alternative" may have died in '91, but "Indy" is what everyone's been reduced to. Which would be okay if the musicians got paid.

Whisky Prajer said...

Oh: CFNY

pdb said...

Got on Twitter earlier today (after break of a day or two) and was ‘rewarded’ (yeah, that’s how they get you maan) by chancing on an illustrator I hadn’t encountered before, Nicole Rifkin — youngish but accomplished. Coincidental tweet from her a few days ago recalled to mind your post here, brought a smile.

Whisky Prajer said...

Haha! Well, she is a good sport. Both my kids took a pass when I brought the disc out. In the main they would rather make their own musical discoveries. Which I can get.