Friday, August 07, 2020

Re: nerding/re-nerding

My wife and I have been re-watching Star Trek: Deep Space 9, starting right from the very beginning. I initially imagined I’d cherry-pick episodes until the final three seasons when continuity and quality seemed to finally gel into narrative satisfaction. But to my surprise the early episodes stand up much, much better than I remembered.

Back in the day, the stereotypes seemed painted with a broad brush — Odo and Quark, particularly. The way I recollected it René Auberjonois flat-footed the security constable Odo as recognizably gruff but lovable, while Armin Shimerman played his Ferengi character as recognizably weaselly, cunning, amusing — two very fine actors in gobs of latex, Kabuki-playing for the paycheque while the writers got a better feel for the characters and rounded them out in future seasons.
"Shall I lead the next dance?"
Turns out the relationship between Odo and Quark is, right out of the gate, a nuanced exploration of power dynamics between Law Enforcement and the Ambitious-if-occasionally-criminal Entrepreneur. Current qualms regarding policing and the populace get a sensitive rendering on two very different sides of the fence in the portrait of these two “aliens” — provoking deeper thought than might, say, a cop show exploring the dynamic between a Latino officer pestering a Black street hustler in Baltimore.

And that’s just one hot-button topic that hasn’t grown any cooler in the intervening decades. There’s also colonizer/post-colonized relations, religion/science/secular education tensions, gender and racial dynamics and a host of other fraught subjects explored — humanely, with subtlety!

ST:DS9 is, effectively, something I can enjoy even more than I originally did because of the current cultural moment.

Be that as it may, another new Star Trek now drops: Lower Decks. At NYmag Angelica Jade Bastién wants to love it, but has misgivings. Personally I gave up early on Discovery, haven’t bothered at all with Picard, and hold the forthcoming Strange New Worlds with suspicion earned from franchise mishandling of Discovery. But animation is its own interest with me, so I may yet tune in.

Also: over at MEL Tim Grierson reconsiders “a Star Wars movie you probably don’t remember”Star Wars: The Clone Wars. In fact I DO remember it — I took my daughter out of school so we could catch an afternoon matinee. I dozed off for a few minutes, as is inevitable in any afternoon, but my daughter loved it. And I loved the TV series that followed. “For (some), Ahsoka and Rex were as important as Han and Leia — or Rey and Kylo Ren.” So far as I am concerned? Ahsoka and Rex is the only realized relationship in the entire franchise.

5 comments:

Joel Swagman said...

I think the general idea of Lower Decks is a good idea. I liked the original TNG episode "Lower Decks", and when I first heard about the new TV show, I assumed it would be similar to that episode.
The previews for it, however, look terrible. Is this the tone the series is going for?

I'm fully anticipating it will be awful.

On the other hand, as you indicated, the franchise has to take some risks now and then if they don't want to stagnate completely. Television has changed a lot since the 1990s, so Star Trek has to adapt to the new landscape. And trying to adapt will always involve some successes as well as some failures. So I don't want to be the guy who's saying, "They completely ruined the franchise"

...but, I do firmly think prequels are a terrible idea. There are so many continuity problems in Trek right now created by these prequels.
Plus, prequels are boring. Don't go back to an earlier time. Keep the story going forward!

Joel Swagman said...

Oh, by the way, did you see this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-hGLHOzvgs

Whisky Prajer said...

Re: enough with the prequels -- have you watched any of Picard? I suppose that's the one series that's actually moving the narrative forward. Kinda sad, really.

I started watching the video, assuming these two were roughly my age. Then one of them says, "I was roughly 10-years-old when TNG started..." Eep! I was 22! I'd lived twice the life this kid had when I started watching TNG, and it was terrible TV -- took them nearly three seasons to find their legs! Anyway. Something about realizing how old I am in contrast to these two who encountered the Star Trek Franchise as children is kinda depressing. I might get back to it, though. :)

Joel Swagman said...

Haven't watched Picard. I don't have access to it legally out here. I could perhaps download it online, but I can't be bothered at the moment.
I've been watching reviews of it (those same 2 guys actually have a whole series of videos reviewing Picard--they absolutely hate it), and it doesn't sound great, but...
...but I'm willing to accept that not everything is going to be great. The more risks Star Trek takes, the more slips. I'm just happy they're doing something. I'll give it another try one of these days.

Yes, those 2 guys are about my age. (But that's still pretty old in Youtuber terms.)
Despite their relative youth, they seem to have had the exact same reaction to TNG that you did---tried it out the first season, thought it was horrible, and then didn't come back until after season 3 when they realized how good it had gotten.

Which, as it happens, was my exact experience as well. I gave up on TNG early on, didn't come back to TNG until around season 4, and only then realized that I'd been missing out.

Whisky Prajer said...

Haha! Man, when a 10-year-old in the '80s thinks a show sucks, you KNOW it sucks! I think I subjected my kids to, maybe, three TNG episodes from S1 before moving on. That was a creative team that took their time figuring it out, I'd say.

Interesting that these two don't like "Picard." I'll definitely give them a closer look, so thanks for the introduction.