Pages

Friday, January 03, 2020

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker — final take

As with the previous Star Wars movie, the plan was to see The Rise of Skywalker with one kid, then again a week or two later with the other. Priorities shifted, and the urge to see the movie dropped to the bottom of the list for urchin #2. I have zero motivation to devote time to a second, solo viewing of the movie, so here are some further thoughts, based on what I recall from two weeks ago — indeed, from even further back.

Spoilers follow — not just from the current Star Wars movie, but from the final season of Lost, the TV series that launched J.J. Abrams into the big leagues.
...never gets old....
My favourite scene from season six of Lost is only a few minutes long. The chief protagonist and his crew are running through the jungle in hot pursuit of that season’s Villainous Heavy. They burst into a clearing and unexpectedly encounter a happily married couple who had recused themselves from the action several seasons earlier, puttering about the yard in front of their Mr. And Mrs. Howell bamboo hut. For a moment everyone stops in their tracks with a “So THERE you are!” reaction. Then the Mrs. does an up-and-down take of the protagonist and says, “You still chasing each other with guns?”

“You still chasing each other with guns?” seems to have been Rian Johnson’s question. In his Star Wars Universe The New Republic was a failure of imagination and execution of Chestertonian proportions. The ways of The Force were misunderstood and misapplied. The new generation was, out of necessity, going to have to devote its energies to deepening its family ties.

These were issues of nuance that, were they to be explored and developed to conclusion, would require a subtle touch.

J.J. Abrams had been here once before. For five seasons, Lost played with and defied viewer expectations. Villains were introduced and teased apart until they were distressingly sympathetic characters. Motivations were acted upon to the final degree, and the outcomes were an astonishment nobody saw coming. Now here they all were, still doing this “Grab the gun!” monkey dance. It was time to wrap it up.

Time to throw all the toys back into the toybox, give it a hard shake — and pull out even more bigger guns than ever before.

I can’t recall who said it, but I’m thinking Locke Peterseim or Steve O’Donahue — J.J. Abrams is a devotee of the white-board. He doesn’t plot or do character arcs — he and his team do board-room improv until they settle on the five or so flashiest sequences, then tie them together with narrative threads best left unscrutinized.

If that makes it sound like I hated the movie, I’m sorry — I liked it well enough. The one thing Abrams does well is give his actors just enough motivation to successfully emote. So, yes — I was dabbing at my eyes as this character lived while that one died.

But this most recent generation of Star Wars movie actors have all signalled (John Boyega chief among them) that they are so ready to ditch this franchise. And I am cheering them on.

Give Abrams some other Cold War franchise to muck with — James Bond, maybe. I can content myself with memories, bolstered by the occasional comic book and television series.

Better explication:
Post-script:
  • It has to be said: my jaw hit the floor when I finally registered just how far to the sidelines Abrams was pushing Kelly Marie Trans Rose Tico. I still consider Tran and her character one of the loveliest introductions to the SWU, and this move seemed like an open concession to racist trolls.
  • To quote me, responding to Joel in the previous post: “Forty-two years and countless hours of Star Wars later, it strikes me that ‘Han Shoots First’ was the most memorable bit in the three movie trilogies — or possibly the entire SWU ball of wax, even as it continues to accrue.” Discuss!

8 comments:

  1. Looks like we're largely in agreement on this movie.
    Although to be fair, writing the last movie of the trilogy is always a thankless task. It's much more interesting to tease out the mysteries and set up the conflicts than it is to resolve them.
    In retrospect, this was probably part of the problem with Return of the Jedi too.
    And this latest movie suffers from the same problem.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Man, you know The Force is out of alignment when you and I are in complete agreement!

    You've got me thinking about trilogy concluders. LOTR did alright, even after Aragorn shampooed his hair and started singing. And for what it was the third Matrix movie tied up most of the concerns raised by the previous two. Dramatically off-putting, but still.

    But here we have a trilogy of trilogies, possibly the first (?) in American cinema, at least where original content is concerned. And I have to say that despite the first two recent chapters, this capper reduces the three to... well, is it worse than the prequels?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the prequels were actually bad, whereas this movie was just mediocre.

    Although... I don't know if you're familiar with the argument that's been making the rounds on the Internet that the prequels were better than the sequel trilogy because "at least the prequels were trying to do something different"

    I was not a fan of that argument at first, but after seeing just how much of Rise of Skywalker was recycling Star Wars plot points on autopilot, I'm starting to come around to the argument.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is remarkable how the prequels are getting a little belated love from people who initially scorned them. From my POV I have to admit that as disappointed as I was with them upon release, they did supply an unexpectedly sturdy narrative base from which a myriad of sub narratives could be launched. I don't see how that can happen here, but then I'm old and tired.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, like how the Clone Wars TV show could launch out from the framework of the prequels.
    I guess Star Wars resistance is an attempt to do the same thing with the sequel trilogy. But I haven't bothered to check it out yet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am an unabashed fan of The Clone Wars and even have some love for Rebels. But I've yet to see Resistance or the original "Samurai Jack" version of Clone Wars. I wonder if the latter even figures into canon these days.

    Anyway, it seems like the prequels spread out a decent sandbox for writers and concept artists to play in. On further consideration I think this last trilogy might also perform the same favour. Settings like Takodana with characters like Maz Kanata are somewhat inspirational, I'd say. We shall see.

    ReplyDelete
  7. T. talked briefly about maybe wanting to see the new SW a few weeks ago. We said we’d hold off and see if family got together a show-going while we were in the respective gathering places over Christmas, something both families have been wont to do. As it happened, nobody suggested a movie night either with her family or mine (with hers, we went to NBA farm-team b-ball) or so much as mentioned it in my hearing. I don’t recall younger-teen nephews, very into SW when I was staying with brother’s family for some time last year, having a thing to say about it during this holiday visit. T. & I went to see much-ballyhooed Parasite yesterday, a packed 5:30 showing. (She did a little stint in Korea during grad school.) SW was playing in that theater, I noted, but hasn’t come up again between us since first floated last month — negatively or positively. Forgotten, effectively. Not that I’m not still a little curious about it. But I’m curious about a lot of things.

    ReplyDelete
  8. All these planets being blown to smithereens -- it's a wonder this galaxy far, far away has any gravitational field remaining.

    ReplyDelete